Python class instances stored in a list to store seperate instances
By : MHPC_Solutions
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will help you It looks like you want a class variable. The code should look like this: code :
from datetime import datetime
class Sms_store:
store = []
message_count = 0
def __init__(self):
pass
def add_new_arrival(self,number,time,text):
Sms_store.store.append(("From: "+number, "Recieved: "+time,"Msg: "+text))
Sms_store.message_count += 1
newsms1 = Sms_store()
time = datetime.now().strftime('%H:%M:%S')
newsms1.add_new_arrival("23456",time, "hello, how are you?")
newsms2 = Sms_store()
time = datetime.now().strftime('%H:%M:%S')
newsms2.add_new_arrival("23456",time, "hello, how are you?")
print Sms_store.store
|
Storing "global" object outside of Redux store in React/Redux app
By : Elissa Hull
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
this one helps. Redux Thunk, authored by gaeron, he who authored redux, since 2.1.0 allows you to do: code :
const store = createStore(
reducer,
applyMiddleware(thunk.withExtraArgument(api))
)
// later
function fetchUser(id) {
return (dispatch, getState, api) => {
// you can use api here
}
}
|
Redux Newbie Trying to Make Pure-Data Class That Uses Redux Store
By : vdravid
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish did fix the issue. The nice thing about the react-redux helpers is that they allow you to use connect() and to automatically pass the store to child components via React's context. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that you have to use these helpers, especially in areas of a codebase that don't use React. So here lies the problem: connect() and help us by giving our React components access to a singleton instance of a store, but how can we access this store somewhere where connect() and can't be used? code :
import {createStore} from 'redux';
const initialState = {
currentId: 1,
things: ['foo', 'bar']
};
const reducer = (state = initialState, action) => {
if (action.type === 'SET_CURRENT_ID') {
return Object.assign({}, state, {
currentId: action.id
});
}
return state;
};
const store = createStore(reducer);
class Store {
constructor() {
this._store = undefined;
}
setStore(store) {
this._store = store;
}
getCurrentThing() {
if (this._store) {
const {things, currentId} = this._store.getState();
return things[currentId];
}
}
setCurrentThing(id) {
if (this._store) {
const action = {
type: 'SET_CURRENT_ID',
id
};
this._store.dispatch(action);
}
}
}
export let singletonStore = new Store();
import {singletonStore} from './store';
singletonStore.setStore(store);
import {singletonStore} from './store';
console.log(singletonStore.getCurrentThing()); // 'bar'
singletonStore.setCurrentThing(0);
console.log(singletonStore.getCurrentThing()); // 'foo'
|
Is it Okay to store functions and instances of Class in redux store?
By : avez quadari
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish helps you The Redux store is supposed to be the 'single source of truth' for the application. It is where all the state of the application should reside. Any type that can be stored as state of a Component can be stored in Redux. Your question seems to consist of 2 main parts.
|
Redux saga using parameters of other instances of the class
By : Patrik Hägglund
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish of those help It seems to the problem is not in Saga, but same agent is used in any new api instance. If you check code :
const i1 = new APIClass('1', '1');
const i2 = new APIClass('2','2');
console.log(i1.instance === i2.instance); // true
const superagentUse = require('superagent-use');
const superagent = require('superagent');
module.exports = class APIClass {
constructor (spaceID, accessToken) {
const agent = superagentUse(superagent); // this agent will be used only in this instance
agent.use(prefix(...));
|